When we were champions

ALSO PUBLISHED ON THE DAWN BLOG

“Hassan Sardar to Kalimullah, Kalimullah takes the ball into the D, he dodges one, two players, he shoots. Kalimullah has just scored a goal for Pakistan in the Olympics” This is an example of some of the voices that are burnt into my memory. Voices from a time when there was one channel on television, and the two most important events for Pakistani viewers were the nine o’ clock khabarnama or any hockey match that Pakistan team played.

Many people wonder why hockey is Pakistan’s national sport given that cricket seems to dominate the nation’s thoughts. But those who had the privilege to see the Pakistan team in action against West Germany during the 1984 Olympics understand why this is the case.

Back then, we were not just the winners of an Olympic gold medal, we also created history. In that game, the Pakistan side introduced a new tactic – the dribble – to the art of hockey playing.

This was not surprising given Pakistan’s consistent performance in the sport. After winning the Olympic gold in 1960, Pakistan made it to the finals in 1964, 1968 (when they took home another gold medal), and 1972.

Pakistan was to field hockey what Brazil is to football. Our players moved the ball at the end of their sticks at such a pace that they would often beat three or four defenders to strike at the opponent’s goal. The players’ speed was unmatched, earning them nicknames such as The Flying Horse. (Samiullah, who was given that moniker, was one of our dribbling greats.)

Sunday’s hockey match against India was disappointing to watch, not because we lost, but because it was quite obvious that Pakistan has abandoned its famed dribbling skills and switched to the conventional long pass, penalty corner strategy that has been put to efficient use by European teams in the last decade. It is understandable that our hockey play has evolved to incorporate these strategies because the playing surface has changed to AstroTurf. Still, it was sad to see that we have forgotten why we were once champions.

Today, we boast a forward such as Rehan Butt, but rather than play on the offensive, we are focusing on getting penalty corners and handing the ball over to Sohail Abbas. Not that I have anything against Abbas: he is fantastic in his own right and is the only man to score above 300 goals in hockey. But penalty corners, of which, on Sunday, he could convert only one out of six, suggest that he’s not the right man to set a field on fire.

Hockey will always be as much a mental and morale-driven game as it is a physical one, and the sight of a couple of Pakistani players blazing down the field dribbling through an opponent’s defenses is one that is bound to intimidate the competition.

We need to get back to our basics if we want to reach the later stages of this world cup. Rather than appropriate a robotic, European style of play, we should embrace our natural game. Imitation may be a great form of flattery, but why imitate when one possesses such talent? Its time we abandon adaptation and let improvisation flow.

3 comments
  1. Your words does walk one down memory lane to a time when hockey was as much a part of a child’s youth as gali cricket. For me field hockey has always been a sport near my heart and one that I played throughout my secondary school days at Saint Patrick’s. I remember waking early in the morning in my summer vacations to go to the hockey camp in school and playing there. I remember going to the hockey stadium to watch matches regularly and could name every player with ease.

    My departure for university in the US killed my passion when I was starved of the sport there (field hockey being played only by women there). During this time the sport atrophied in Pakistan, mostly due to lack of astro-turfs being installed and our men losing their competitive edge somewhat. In addition, the over glorification of cricket especially post-world cup 1992 led to this game being removed from the hearts and minds as our national sport.

    Hockey has been replaced somewhat by soccer as a alternate game to cricket but hockey is a unique sport. In soccer your control over the ball depends on your legs; in hockey the hockey stick must be wielded expertly so as to almost become an extension of your body. Thus, it requires considerable higher level of dexterity. Inaddition, it requires optimum eye-hand-foot coordination.

    Sadly, our government has never promoted the sport and I remember hockey players being grossly underpaid as compared to hockey. This and other factors led to the death of Pakistan hockey and we were permanently dethroned from the champions to the has-beens.

    -Aly

    http://discomaulvi.wordpress.com/
    http://www.twitter.com/DiscoMaulvi

  2. i agree with the fact that main reason behind our laking in field hockey is the change in style we are doing as it is said in Urdu proverb where one make ones face red by slapping…
    i think the real legends should come forward and teach the real Pakistani hockey style to the current team so that the real glory of Pakistan can come out again. i have an emotional bond with hockey and that is why its harsh to see them loosing whats what i said in one of my blog post :http://mylandpakistan.blogspot.com/2010/03/my-love-with-hockey-is-emotional.html

Comments are closed.